小狗阅读会员会员
医学顶刊SCI精读工具

扫码登录小狗阅读

阅读SCI医学文献
Document
订阅泛读方向 订阅泛读期刊
  • 我的关注
  • 我的关注
  • {{item.title}}

    按需关注领域/方向,精准获取前沿热点

  • {{item.title}}

    {{item.follow}}人关注

  • {{item.subscribe_count}}人订阅

    IF:{{item.impact_factor}}

    {{item.title}}

Comparison of endovascular aneurysm sealing and repair with respect to contrast use and radiation in comparable patient cohorts.

在可比患者队列中比较血管内动脉瘤封闭和修复与造影剂使用和放射的关系。

  • 影响因子:1.05
  • DOI:10.23736/S0021-9509.18.10206-0
  • 作者列表:"Peters AS","Hatzl J","Bischoff MS","Böckler D
  • 发表时间:2020-02-01
Abstract

BACKGROUND:Due to recent advances in endograft design and percutaneous access, technical success could be increased during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Beside EVAR, endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) provides an alternative procedure to treat aneurysms. To compare the two methods, additional benchmark criteria should be evaluated: Screening time, dose area product (DAP), procedure time and contrast use. In this study these technical variables are analyzed for EVAS vs. EVAR in comparable patient cohorts. METHODS:It is a retrospective, single-center study. Only elective cases of infrarenal aortic aneurysms were included, all treated by the same surgeon (D.B.). Procedures were performed within the instructions for use without additional procedures. All operations were undertaken in a hybrid operating theatre. For EVAR, only the Medtronic Endurant® and the Gore C3 Excluder® were included. For EVAS the Nellix® from Endologix was used. RESULTS:Between 2012 and 2016, 67 patients were treated with EVAS and 40 with EVAR; of these 20 and 16 could be introduced into the study respectively. Median age was 73 and 72 years respectively (only men). The two groups were comparable in terms of BMI, GFR and ASA-status. Screening time was reduced for EVAS (10.6 vs. 14.5 min., P<0.01), while the DAP was not significantly different. Procedural time and contrast use were increased for EVAS (120 vs. 96 min., 120 vs. 79 mL, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS:Especially the younger EVAS-procedure requires ongoing review in order to further reduce contrast agent. Reduced screening time for EVAS does not have a significant impact on radiation dose.

摘要

背景: 由于近期内移植设计和经皮入路的进展,动脉瘤腔内修复术 (EVAR) 的技术成功可能会增加。除EVAR外,血管内动脉瘤封闭术 (EVAS) 提供了治疗动脉瘤的替代方法。为了比较两种方法,应评估额外的基准标准: 筛选时间、剂量面积产物 (DAP) 、手术时间和造影剂使用。在本研究中,在可比患者队列中分析EVAS与EVAR的这些技术变量。 方法: 这是一项回顾性、单中心研究。仅纳入肾下主动脉瘤的择期病例,均由同一外科医生 (D.B.) 治疗。在使用说明内执行程序,无需额外程序。所有手术均在混合手术室进行。对于EVAR来说,只有美敦力的Endurant®和戈尔C3 排斥者®包括在内。对于EVAS的Nellix®使用了Endologix。 结果: 在 2012 和 2016 之间,67 例患者接受EVAS治疗,40 例患者接受EVAR治疗; 其中 20 例和 16 例分别可以引入研究。中位年龄分别为 73 岁和 72 岁 (仅男性)。两组在BMI、GFR和ASA状态方面具有可比性。EVAS的筛选时间缩短 (10.6 vs. 14.5 min,P<0.01),而DAP无显著差异。EVAS的手术时间和造影剂使用增加 (120 vs. 96 min.,120 vs. 79 mL,P<0.01)。 结论: 尤其是年轻的EVAS手术需要持续审查,以进一步减少造影剂。EVAS筛查时间的减少对辐射剂量没有显著影响。

关键词:
阅读人数:5人
下载该文献
小狗阅读

帮助医生、学生、科研工作者解决SCI文献找不到、看不懂、阅读效率低的问题。提供领域精准的SCI文献,通过多角度解析提高文献阅读效率,从而使用户获得有价值研究思路。

相关文献
影响因子:1.05
发表时间:2020-02-01
DOI:10.23736/S0021-9509.18.10206-0
作者列表:["Peters AS","Hatzl J","Bischoff MS","Böckler D"]

METHODS:BACKGROUND:Due to recent advances in endograft design and percutaneous access, technical success could be increased during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Beside EVAR, endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) provides an alternative procedure to treat aneurysms. To compare the two methods, additional benchmark criteria should be evaluated: Screening time, dose area product (DAP), procedure time and contrast use. In this study these technical variables are analyzed for EVAS vs. EVAR in comparable patient cohorts. METHODS:It is a retrospective, single-center study. Only elective cases of infrarenal aortic aneurysms were included, all treated by the same surgeon (D.B.). Procedures were performed within the instructions for use without additional procedures. All operations were undertaken in a hybrid operating theatre. For EVAR, only the Medtronic Endurant® and the Gore C3 Excluder® were included. For EVAS the Nellix® from Endologix was used. RESULTS:Between 2012 and 2016, 67 patients were treated with EVAS and 40 with EVAR; of these 20 and 16 could be introduced into the study respectively. Median age was 73 and 72 years respectively (only men). The two groups were comparable in terms of BMI, GFR and ASA-status. Screening time was reduced for EVAS (10.6 vs. 14.5 min., P<0.01), while the DAP was not significantly different. Procedural time and contrast use were increased for EVAS (120 vs. 96 min., 120 vs. 79 mL, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS:Especially the younger EVAS-procedure requires ongoing review in order to further reduce contrast agent. Reduced screening time for EVAS does not have a significant impact on radiation dose.

关键词: 暂无
翻译标题与摘要 下载文献
影响因子:4.91
发表时间:2020-04-01
来源期刊:Annals of surgery
DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000003050
作者列表:["Karthaus EG","Vahl A","van der Werf LR","Elsman BHP","Van Herwaarden JA","Wouters MWJM","Hamming JF"]

METHODS:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate reasons to deviate from aneurysm diameter thresholds, and focus on the difference in how Dutch vascular surgical units (VSUs) perceive their deviation and their actual deviation. BACKGROUND:Guidelines recommend surgical treatment for asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) with a diameter of at least 55 mm for men and 50 mm for women. We evaluate reasons to deviate from these guidelines, and focus on the difference in how Dutch vascular surgical units (VSUs) perceive their deviation and their actual deviation. METHODS:All patients undergoing elective AAA repair between 2013 and 2016 registered in the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit (DSAA) were included. Surgery at diameters of <55 mm for men and <50 mm for women were considered guideline deviations. National deviation and hospital variation in deviation were evaluated over time. Questionnaires were distributed among all Dutch VSUs, inquiring for acceptable reasons for guideline deviation. VSUs were asked to estimate the guideline deviation percentage in their hospital which was then compared with their DSAA percentage. RESULTS:In all, 9039 patients were included. In 15%, we found guideline deviation, varying from 2% to 40% between VSUs. Over time, 21 VSUs were identified with a lower percentage of deviation than the national mean each year and 8 VSUs with a higher percentage. 44/60 VSUs completed the questionnaire. Most commonly reported reasons to deviate were concomitant large iliac diameter (91%) and saccular aneurysm (82%). The majority of the VSUs (77%) estimated their guideline deviation to be <5%. Eleven VSUs (25%) estimated their deviation concordant with their DSAA percentage, but 75% of VSUs underestimated their deviation. CONCLUSIONS:Dutch VSUs regularly deviate from the guidelines regarding aneurysm diameter, with variation between VSUs. Consensus exists amongst VSUs on acceptable reasons for guideline deviations; however, the majority underestimates their actual deviation percentage.

关键词: 暂无
翻译标题与摘要 下载文献
影响因子:1.05
发表时间:2020-04-01
DOI:10.23736/S0021-9509.18.10639-2
作者列表:["Kodama H","Takahashi S","Okazaki T","Morita S","Go S","Watanabe M","Yamane Y","Katayama K","Kurosaki T","Sueda T"]

METHODS:BACKGROUND:Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) and paraplegia are complications of surgery for type A acute aortic dissection (TAAAD). Since the segmental arteries play a key role in SCI, this study evaluated the association between SCI and false lumen segmental arteries (FLSAs: segmental arteries originating from the false lumen). METHODS:The study included 101 consecutive TAAAD patients (mean age, 66±13; range, 34-89 years) who underwent surgery from January 2011 to April 2017. The diagnosis of TAAAD and the number of FSLAs were determined by preoperative computed tomography (CT). Patients were divided into two groups according to the number of FLSAs at the Th9-L2 level: Group A (N.=13), ≥8 FLSAs; and group B (N.=88), ≤7 FLSAs. Preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative findings were compared between the groups, and risk factors for SCI were evaluated. RESULTS:The frequency of preoperative paralysis was significantly higher in Group A than Group B (P=.0070). The overall incidence of postoperative SCI was 8% (8/101) and significantly higher in Group A than Group B (5/13 [45%] vs. 3/88 (4%), P<0.0001). Hospital mortality was 8% (8/101) and significantly higher in Group A than Group B (3/13 [23%] vs. 5/88 [6%], P=.0302). Multivariate analysis showed that the independent risk factors for SCI were ≥8 FLSAs at Th9-L2 (odds ratio [OR], 20.4; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 3.34-124.9, P=0.0011) and diabetes mellitus (OR, 22.3; 95% CI, 1.69-294.5; P=0.0184). CONCLUSIONS:In patients who underwent surgery for TAAAD, ≥8 FLSAs at the Th9-L2 levels on preoperative CT was a risk factor for SCI.

关键词: 暂无
翻译标题与摘要 下载文献
动脉瘤方向

动脉瘤是由于动脉壁的病变或损伤,形成动脉壁局限性或弥漫性扩张或膨出,以膨胀性、搏动性肿块为主要表现,可以发生在动脉系统的任何部位,而以肢体主干动脉、主动脉和颈动脉较为常见。

复制标题
发送后即可在该邮箱或我的下载查看该文献
发送
该文献默认存储到我的下载

科研福利

临床科研之家订阅号

报名咨询

建议反馈
问题标题:
联系方式:
电子邮件:
您的需求: