小狗阅读会员会员
医学顶刊SCI精读工具

扫码登录小狗阅读

阅读SCI医学文献
Document
订阅泛读方向 订阅泛读期刊
  • 我的关注
  • 我的关注
  • {{item.title}}

    按需关注领域/方向,精准获取前沿热点

  • {{item.title}}

    {{item.follow}}人关注

  • {{item.subscribe_count}}人订阅

    IF:{{item.impact_factor}}

    {{item.title}}

Long-term functional and oncological outcomes of nerve-sparing and prostate capsule-sparing cystectomy: a single-centre experience.

保留神经和前列腺囊的膀胱切除术的长期功能和肿瘤学结局: 单中心经验。

  • 影响因子:3.27
  • DOI:10.1111/bju.14850
  • 作者列表:"Saad M","Moschini M","Stabile A","Macek P","Lanz C","Prapotnich D","Rozet F","Cathala N","Mombet A","Sanchez-Salas R","Cathelineau X
  • 发表时间:2020-02-01
Abstract

OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the technical feasibility, oncological and functional outcomes of nerve sparing cystoprostatectomy (NSCP) and prostate capsule-sparing cystectomy (PCSC) for the treatment of organ-confined bladder cancer at a single referral centre. PATIENTS AND METHODS:From April 2001 to June 2012, 60 patients underwent PCSC and 47 were treated with NSCP. Inclusion criteria for PCSC were: fully informed consent for the well-motivated patient; negative transurethral resection of the bladder neck; normal prostatic specific antigen (PSA) level (defined as <4 ng/dL during the first year of the study, which was later lowered to 2.5 ng/dL); and normal transrectal ultrasonography, with biopsy for any suspicious nodule. Patients received a complete oncological and functional follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to depict survival outcomes after surgery. RESULTS:After a median follow-up of 73 and 62 months for PCSC and NSCP, respectively, the 5-year cancer-specific survival was 90% for the PCSC group and 78% for the NSCP group (P = 0.055). Considering complications within 30 days after surgery, 13% and 21% patients had Clavien ≥III complications in the PCSC and NSCP groups, respectively (P = 0.2). For functional outcomes, at 3 months after surgery, 54 (90%) and 24 (51%) patients reported full recovery of daytime urinary continence in the PCSC and NSCP groups, respectively (P < 0.001); and for erectile function recovery, 32 (53%) and four (9%) patients in the PCSC group and in the NSCP group were respectively potent without any treatment (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:NSCP and PCSC are appropriate for a subset of patients with bladder cancer, with excellent oncological and functional results. These surgical procedures should be proposed to well-motivated patients.

摘要

目的: 评估保留神经的膀胱前列腺切除术 (NSCP) 和保留前列腺囊的膀胱切除术 (PCSC) 的技术可行性、肿瘤学和功能结局用于单转诊中心治疗器官局限型膀胱癌。 患者与方法: 2001 年 4 月至 2012 年 6 月,60 例患者接受PCSC,47 例接受NSCP治疗。PCSC的纳入标准为: 动机良好的患者完全知情同意; 经尿道膀胱颈切除术阴性; 正常前列腺特异性抗原 (PSA) 水平 (定义为在研究的第一年 <4 ng/dL,后来降至 2.5 ng/dL); 和正常的经直肠超声检查,活检发现任何可疑结节。患者接受了完整的肿瘤和功能随访。采用Kaplan-Meier法描述术后生存结局。 结果: 在PCSC和NSCP的中位随访时间分别为 73 个月和 62 个月后,PCSC组的 5 年癌症特异性生存率为 90%,NSCP组为 78% (P = 0.0 5。考虑到术后 30 天内的并发症,PCSC组和NSCP组中Clavien ≥ iii级并发症分别为 13% 和 21% 例 (P = 0.2)。对于功能结局,术后 3 个月时,54 例 (90%) 和 24 例 (51%) 患者报告PCSC和NSCP组白天控尿完全恢复,分别 (P < 0.001); 勃起功能恢复,3 2 (5 3%) 和 4 (9%)PCSC组和NSCP组的患者在没有任何治疗的情况下分别有效 (P <0.001)。 结论: NSCP和PCSC适用于一部分膀胱癌患者,具有良好的肿瘤学和功能结果。这些手术程序应该向积极主动的患者提出。

下载该文献
小狗阅读

帮助医生、学生、科研工作者解决SCI文献找不到、看不懂、阅读效率低的问题。提供领域精准的SCI文献,通过多角度解析提高文献阅读效率,从而使用户获得有价值研究思路。

相关文献
影响因子:1.46
发表时间:2020-01-01
来源期刊:The Journal of urology
DOI:10.1097/JU.0000000000000351
作者列表:["Morera DS","Hasanali SL","Belew D","Ghosh S","Klaassen Z","Jordan AR","Wang J","Terris MK","Bollag RJ","Merseburger AS","Stenzl A","Soloway MS","Lokeshwar VB"]

METHODS:PURPOSE:Studies indicate that molecular subtypes in muscle invasive bladder cancer predict the clinical outcome. We evaluated whether subtyping by a simplified method and established classifications could predict the clinical outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS:We subtyped institutional cohort 1 of 52 patients, including 39 with muscle invasive bladder cancer, an Oncomine™ data set of 151 with muscle invasive bladder cancer and TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) data set of 402 with muscle invasive bladder cancer. Subtyping was done using simplified panels (MCG-1 and MCG-Ext) which included only transcripts common in published studies and were analyzed for predicting metastasis, and cancer specific, overall and recurrence-free survival. TCGA data set was further analyzed using the Lund taxonomy, the Bladder Cancer Molecular Taxonomy Group Consensus and TCGA 2017 mRNA subtype classifications. RESULTS:Muscle invasive bladder cancer specimens from cohort 1 and the Oncomine data set showed intratumor heterogeneity for transcript and protein expression. MCG-1 subtypes did not predict the outcome on univariate or Kaplan-Meier analysis. On multivariate analysis N stage (p ≤0.007), T stage (p ≤0.04), M stage (p=0.007) and/or patient age (p=0.01) predicted metastasis, cancer specific and overall survival, and/or the cisplatin based adjuvant chemotherapy response. In TCGA data set publications showed that subtypes risk stratified patients for overall survival. Consistently the MCG-1 and MCG-Ext subtypes were associated with overall but not recurrence-free survival on univariate and Kaplan-Meier analyses. TCGA data set included 21 low grade specimens of the total of 402 and subtypes associated with tumor grade (p=0.005). However, less than 1% of muscle invasive bladder cancer cases are low grade. In only high grade specimens the MCG-1 and MCG-Ext subtypes could not predict overall survival. On univariate analysis subtypes according to the Bladder Cancer Molecular Taxonomy Group Consensus, TCGA 2017 and the Lund taxonomy were associated with tumor grade (p <0.0001) and overall survival (p=0.01 to <0.0001). Regardless of classification, subtypes had about 50% to 60% sensitivity and specificity to predict overall and recurrence-free survival. On multivariate analyses N stage and lymphovascular invasion consistently predicted recurrence-free and overall survival (p=0.039 and 0.003, respectively). CONCLUSIONS:Molecular subtypes reflect bladder tumor heterogeneity and are associated with tumor grade. In multiple cohorts and subtyping classifications the clinical parameters outperformed subtypes for predicting the outcome.

翻译标题与摘要 下载文献
影响因子:6.93
发表时间:2020-02-15
DOI:10.1002/ijc.32505
作者列表:["Namekawa T","Ikeda K","Horie-Inoue K","Suzuki T","Okamoto K","Ichikawa T","Yano A","Kawakami S","Inoue S"]

METHODS::Acquired chemoresistance is a critical issue for advanced bladder cancer patients during long-term treatment. Recent studies reveal that a fraction of tumor cells with enhanced tumor-initiating potential, or cancer stem-like cells (CSCs), may particularly contribute to acquired chemoresistance and recurrence. Thus, CSC characterization will be the first step towards understanding the mechanisms underlying advanced disease. Here we generated long-term patient-derived cancer cells (PDCs) from bladder cancer patient specimens in spheroid culture, which is favorable for CSC enrichment. Pathological features of bladder cancer PDCs and PDC-dependent patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) were basically similar to those of their corresponding patients' specimens. Notably, CSC marker aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A1 (ALDH1A1), a critical enzyme that synthesizes retinoic acid (RA), was abundantly expressed in PDCs. ALDH1A1 inhibitors and shRNAs repressed both PDC proliferation and spheroid formation, whereas all-trans RA could rescue ALDH1A1 shRNA-suppressed spheroid formation. ALDH inhibitor also reduced the in vivo growth of PDC-derived xenografts. ALDH1A1 knockdown study showed that tubulin beta III (TUBB3) was one of the downregulated genes in PDCs. We identified functional RA response elements in TUBB3 promoter, whose transcriptional activities were substantially activated by RA. Clinical survival database reveals that TUBB3 expression may associate with poor prognosis in bladder cancer patients. Moreover, TUBB3 knockdown was sufficient to suppress PDC proliferation and spheroid formation. Taken together, our results indicate that ALDH1A1 and its putative downstream target TUBB3 are overexpressed in bladder cancer, and those molecules could be applied to alternative diagnostic and therapeutic options for advanced disease.

翻译标题与摘要 下载文献
影响因子:3.27
发表时间:2020-02-01
来源期刊:BJU international
DOI:10.1111/bju.14850
作者列表:["Saad M","Moschini M","Stabile A","Macek P","Lanz C","Prapotnich D","Rozet F","Cathala N","Mombet A","Sanchez-Salas R","Cathelineau X"]

METHODS:OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the technical feasibility, oncological and functional outcomes of nerve sparing cystoprostatectomy (NSCP) and prostate capsule-sparing cystectomy (PCSC) for the treatment of organ-confined bladder cancer at a single referral centre. PATIENTS AND METHODS:From April 2001 to June 2012, 60 patients underwent PCSC and 47 were treated with NSCP. Inclusion criteria for PCSC were: fully informed consent for the well-motivated patient; negative transurethral resection of the bladder neck; normal prostatic specific antigen (PSA) level (defined as <4 ng/dL during the first year of the study, which was later lowered to 2.5 ng/dL); and normal transrectal ultrasonography, with biopsy for any suspicious nodule. Patients received a complete oncological and functional follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to depict survival outcomes after surgery. RESULTS:After a median follow-up of 73 and 62 months for PCSC and NSCP, respectively, the 5-year cancer-specific survival was 90% for the PCSC group and 78% for the NSCP group (P = 0.055). Considering complications within 30 days after surgery, 13% and 21% patients had Clavien ≥III complications in the PCSC and NSCP groups, respectively (P = 0.2). For functional outcomes, at 3 months after surgery, 54 (90%) and 24 (51%) patients reported full recovery of daytime urinary continence in the PCSC and NSCP groups, respectively (P < 0.001); and for erectile function recovery, 32 (53%) and four (9%) patients in the PCSC group and in the NSCP group were respectively potent without any treatment (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:NSCP and PCSC are appropriate for a subset of patients with bladder cancer, with excellent oncological and functional results. These surgical procedures should be proposed to well-motivated patients.

膀胱疾病方向

包括膀胱炎、膀胱结石、膀胱瘘、膀胱肿瘤等疾病。

复制标题
发送后即可在该邮箱或我的下载查看该文献
发送
该文献默认存储到我的下载

科研福利

临床科研之家订阅号

报名咨询

建议反馈
问题标题:
联系方式:
电子邮件:
您的需求: