小狗阅读会员会员
有解析的医学SCI阅读工具

扫码登录小狗阅读

阅读SCI医学文献

Test Administration Methods and Cognitive Test Scores in Older Adults with Hearing Loss.

老年人听力损失的测试给药方法和认知测试评分。

  • 影响因子:3.70
  • DOI:10.1159/000500777
  • 作者列表:"Shen J","Sherman M","Souza PE
  • 发表时间:2020-01-01
Abstract

:In light of the high prevalence of hearing loss and cognitive impairment in the aging population, it is important to know how cognitive tests should be administered for older adults with hearing loss. The purpose of the present study is to examine this question with a cognitive screening test and a working memory test. Specifically, we asked the following questions in 2 experiments. First, does a controlled amplification method affect cognitive test scores? Second, does test modality (visual vs. auditory) impact cognitive test scores? Three test administration conditions were created for both Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and working memory test (a word recognition and recall test): auditory amplified, auditory unamplified, and visual. The auditory administration was implemented through a computer program to control for presentation level while the visual condition was implemented through timed computer slides. Data were collected from older individuals with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss. We did not find any effect of amplification or test modality on the total score of the cognitive screening test (i.e., MoCA). Amplification improved working memory performance as measured by word recall performance, but test modality (auditory vs. visual) did not. These results are consistent with literature in demonstrating a downstream effect of audibility on working memory performance. From a clinical perspective, these findings are informative for developing clinical administration protocols of these tests for older individuals with hearing loss.

摘要

: 鉴于老年人群中听力损失和认知障碍的患病率较高,了解老年人听力损失应如何进行认知测试非常重要。本研究的目的是通过认知筛选测试和工作记忆测试来检验这个问题。具体而言,我们在2个实验中问了以下问题。首先,受控放大方法是否会影响认知测试分数?第二,测试模式 (视觉与听觉) 是否影响认知测试分数?为蒙特利尔认知评估 (MoCA) 和工作记忆测试 (单词识别和回忆测试) 创建了三种测试施用条件: 听觉放大、听觉未放大和视觉。听觉管理通过计算机程序来实现,以控制呈现水平,而视觉状态通过定时计算机幻灯片来实现。从患有轻度至中度感音神经性听力损失的老年人收集数据。我们没有发现扩增或测试模式对认知筛查测试总分的任何影响 (即,MoCA)。扩增改善了通过单词回忆性能测量的工作记忆性能,但测试模态 (听觉与视觉) 没有。这些结果与证明可听性对工作记忆表现的下游影响的文献一致。从临床角度来看,这些发现对于开发这些测试的老年听力损失患者的临床给药方案是有益的。

阅读人数:3人
下载该文献
小狗阅读

帮助医生、学生、科研工作者解决SCI文献找不到、看不懂、阅读效率低的问题。提供领域精准的SCI文献,通过多角度解析提高文献阅读效率,从而使用户获得有价值研究思路。

相关文献
影响因子:2.05
发表时间:2020-02-01
DOI:10.1136/archdischild-2018-315866
作者列表:["Butcher E","Dezateux C","Knowles RL"]

METHODS:OBJECTIVE:While several perinatal risk factors for permanent childhood hearing impairment (PCHI) are known, association with gestational length remains unclear. We hypothesised that shorter gestational length predicts higher PCHI risk. DESIGN:19 504 participants from the UK Millennium Cohort Study (born 2000-2002, prior to newborn screening). METHODS:Multivariable discrete-time survival analysis to examine associations between parent-reported PCHI by age 11 years and gestational length, plus other prespecified factors. RESULTS:PCHI affected 2.1 per 1000 children (95% CI 1.5 to 3.0) by age 11; however, gestational length did not predict PCHI risk (HR, 95% CI 1.00, 0.98 to 1.03 per day increase). Risk was increased in those with neonatal illness, with or without admission to neonatal care (6.33, 2.27 to 17.63 and 2.62, 1.15 to 5.97, respectively), of Bangladeshi or Pakistani ethnicity (2.78, 1.06 to 7.31) or born to younger mothers (0.92, 0.87 to 0.97 per year). CONCLUSION:Neonatal illness, rather than gestational length, predicts PCHI risk. Further research should explore associations with ethnicity.

关键词: 耳聋 流行病学
翻译标题与摘要 下载文献
影响因子:1.09
发表时间:2020-01-01
DOI:10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.10.007
作者列表:["Öçal R","Akın Öçal FC","Güllüev M","Alataş N"]

METHODS:INTRODUCTION:Sudden hearing loss is a significant otologic emergency. Previous studies have revealed a coexistence of sudden hearing loss with chronic inflammation. The predictive importance of C-reactive protein/albumin values as a prognostic factor has been shown in various inflammatory and tumoral conditions. OBJECTIVES:The aim of this study was to determine whether the C-reactive protein/albumin ratio in sudden hearing loss can be used for prognostic purposes and whether there is a relationship between the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and the C-reactive protein/albumin ratio. METHODS:A retrospective examination was made of 40 patients diagnosed with idiopathic sudden hearing loss and a control group of 45 healthy subjects. The pure tone averages of all the patients were determined on first presentation and repeated at 3 months after the treatment. The patients were separated into 2 groups according to the response to treatment. The neutrophil/lynphocyte ratio and the C-reactive protein/albumin ratios were calculated from the laboratory tests. RESULTS:The patients included 16 females and 24 males with a mean age of 44.1±14.2 years and the control group was composed of 23 females and 22 males with a mean age of 42.2±13.8 years. The mean C-reactive protein/albumin ratio was 0.95±0.47 in the patient group and 0.74±0.13 in the control group. The difference was statistically significant (p=0.009). The mean C-reactive protein/albumin ratio was 0.79±0.12 in the response to treatment group and 1.27±0.72 in the non-response group, with no significant difference determined between the groups (p=0.418). The mean neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio was 3.52±3.00 in the response to treatment group and 4.90±4.60 in the non-response group, with no statistically significant difference determined between the groups (p=0.261). CONCLUSION:C-reactive/albumin ratio was significantly higher in patients with sudden hearing loss than in the control group. Although C-reactive protein/albumin ratio was found to be lower in sudden hearing loss patients who responded to treatment compared to those who did not, the difference between two groups was not statistically significant.

影响因子:1.09
发表时间:2020-01-01
DOI:10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.10.006
作者列表:["Scarabello EM","Lamônica DAC","Morettin-Zupelari M","Tanamati LF","Campos PD","Alvarenga KF","Moret ALM"]

METHODS:INTRODUCTION:The cochlear implant is an effective device for children with severe and/or profound prelingual hearing loss, since it provides considerable improvement in oral language acquisition through the auditory pathway. The use of a cochlear implant contributes to the development of auditory perception, favoring the acquisition of the linguistic processes related to communication skills, which might have a positive effect on other areas of development. OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to verify the performance of children using cochlear implants for expressive and receptive oral language. METHODS:This was a prospective cross-sectional study that used the following tests: Child language test in the phonology, vocabulary, fluency and pragmatics areas, and the Peabody picture vocabulary test. Thirty children participated in this study, of both genders, aged between 36 and 72 months, with severe and/or profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, without other impairments and users of unilateral cochlear implant with full electrode insertion for a minimum of 12 months. RESULTS:The longer duration of the cochlear implant use, the younger age at surgery and the better performance in the auditory perception of speech influenced the performance in expressive and receptive oral language. Even though when compared to the normative language acquisition process, the results showed that these children had patterns of linguistic skills that are below their chronological age; the results indicate that these children are developing expressive and receptive oral language skills, and this is the outcome that should be taken into account in this study. CONCLUSION:The longer duration of the cochlear implant use, the younger age at surgery and the better performance in the auditory perception of speech influenced the performance in expressive and receptive oral language skills, but not in all the studied semantic categories.

耳部疾病方向

包括耳部的炎症、耳聋、肿瘤等,发病机制广,且严重性聋可使人处于半残废状态。

复制标题
发送后即可在该邮箱或我的下载查看该文献
发送
该文献默认存储到我的下载

科研福利

报名咨询

建议反馈
问题标题:
联系方式:
电子邮件:
您的需求: