小狗阅读会员会员
医学顶刊SCI精读工具

扫码登录小狗阅读

阅读SCI医学文献
Document
订阅泛读方向 订阅泛读期刊
  • 我的关注
  • 我的关注
  • {{item.title}}

    按需关注领域/方向,精准获取前沿热点

  • {{item.title}}

    {{item.follow}}人关注

  • {{item.subscribe_count}}人订阅

    IF:{{item.impact_factor}}

    {{item.title}}

CASTLE score versus J-CTO score for the prediction of technical success in chronic total occlusion percutaneous revascularisation.

CASTLE 评分与 J-CTO 评分用于预测慢性完全闭塞经皮血运重建的技术成功。

  • 影响因子:2.41
  • DOI:10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00352
  • 作者列表:"Kalogeropoulos AS","Alsanjari O","Keeble TR","Tang KH","Konstantinou K","Katsikis A","Jagathesan R","Aggarwal RK","Clesham GJ","Kelly PA","Werner GS","Hildick-Smith D","Davies JR","Karamasis G
  • 发表时间:2020-04-03
Abstract

AIMS:We sought to compare the efficiency of the novel EuroCTO (CASTLE) score with the commonly used Multicentre CTO Registry in Japan (J-CTO) score in predicting procedural success of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary chronic total occlusions (CTOs). METHODS AND RESULTS:We evaluated 660 consecutive CTO PCIs (mean age 66±11 years, 84% male). The mean J-CTO and EuroCTO (CASTLE) scores were 1.86±1.2 and 1.74±1.2, respectively. Antegrade wire escalation, antegrade dissection re-entry and retrograde approach were used in 82%, 14% and 37% of cases, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated equal overall discriminatory capacity between the two scores (AUC 0.698, 95% CI: 0.653-0.742, p<0.001 for J-CTO vs AUC 0.676, 95% CI: 0.627-0.725, p<0.001 for EuroCTO; AUC difference: 0.022, p=0.5). However, for more complex procedures (J-CTO ≥3 or EuroCTO [CASTLE] ≥4]), the predictive capacity of the EuroCTO (CASTLE) score appeared superior (AUC 0.588, 95% CI: 0.509-0.668, p=0.03 for EuroCTO [CASTLE] score vs AUC 0.473, 95% CI: 0.393-0.553, p=NS for the J-CTO score, AUC difference: 0.115, p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS:In this study, the novel EuroCTO (CASTLE) score was comparable to the J-CTO score in predicting CTO PCI outcome with a superior discriminatory capacity for the more complex cases.

摘要

目的: 我们试图比较新型 EuroCTO (城堡) 评分与日本常用的多中心 CTO 登记处 (J-CTO) 的效率评分预测冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞病变 (CTOs) 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 (PCI) 的手术成功率。 方法和结果: 我们评价了 660 例连续 CTO PCIs (平均年龄 66 ± 11 岁,84% 例男性)。平均 J-CTO 和 EuroCTO (CASTLE) 评分分别为 1.86 ± 1.2 和 1.74 ± 1.2。顺行钢丝升级、顺行解剖复位和逆行入路分别用于 82% 、 14% 和 37% 的病例。受试者操作特征分析显示两个评分之间的总体区分能力相等 (AUC 0.698,95% CI: 0.653-0.742,J-CTO 与 AUC 0.001,0.676 CI 的 p <95%: 0.627-0.725,欧 cto p<0.001; AUC 差值: 0.022,p = 0.5)。然而,对于更复杂的程序 (J-CTO ≥ 3 或 EuroCTO [CASTLE] ≥ 4),EuroCTO (CASTLE) 评分的预测能力出现优越 (AUC 0.588, 95% CI: 0.509-0.668,EuroCTO [CASTLE] 评分 p = 0.03 vs AUC 0.473,95% CI: 0.393-0.553,J-CTO 评分 p = NS,AUC 差值: 0.115,p = 0.04)。 结论: 在本研究中,新型 EuroCTO (CASTLE) 评分在预测 CTO PCI 结局方面与 J-CTO 评分相当,对更复杂的病例具有优越的区分能力。

关键词:
阅读人数:9人
下载该文献
小狗阅读

帮助医生、学生、科研工作者解决SCI文献找不到、看不懂、阅读效率低的问题。提供领域精准的SCI文献,通过多角度解析提高文献阅读效率,从而使用户获得有价值研究思路。

相关文献
影响因子:2.30
发表时间:2020-01-01
来源期刊:Thrombosis research
DOI:10.1016/j.thromres.2019.11.016
作者列表:["Palmerini T","Barozzi C","Tomasi L","Riva DD","Marengo M","Cicoria G","Bruno AG","Bacchi-Reggiani ML","Naldi M","Bartolini M","Fanti S","Galiè N","Stone GW"]

METHODS:Aims : We sought to investigate the thrombogenicity of different DES and BMS in an in vitro system of stent perfusion. Material and Methods: The experimental model consisted of a peristaltic pump connected to 4 parallel silicone tubes in which different stents were deployed. Blood was drawn from healthy volunteers and the amount of stent surfaced -induced thrombus deposition was determined using 125 I -fibrinogen. Results: Compared to Resolute, Biomatrix and Vision, Xience was associated with the lowest amount of stent surface -induced thrombus formation, with a significant difference compared to Vision (125 I -fibrinogen median value deposition [IQ range]: 50 ng [25 -98] versus 560 ng [320 - 1,520], respectively, p<0.05), but not to other DES. In the second set of experiments Fluoropolymer -coated BMS not eluting drug was associated with a significant 3 -fold reduction in 125 I -fibrinogen deposition (245 ng [80 -300]) compared to Vision (625 ng [320 -760], p<0.05), but a 7 -fold increase compared to Xience (35 ng [20 -60], p<0.05). Finally Xience was associated with a significantly greater absorption of albumin compared to BMS. Conclusions: In an in vitro system of stent perfusion, Xience was associated with the lowest amount of stent surface -induced thrombus formation compared with Resolute, Biomatrix and Vision, with a noted synergistic effect between the fluoropolymer and the drug.

翻译标题与摘要 下载文献
影响因子:10.49
发表时间:2020-01-02
DOI:10.1172/JCI124708
作者列表:["Jain M","Dhanesha N","Doddapattar P","Chorawala MR","Nayak MK","Cornelissen A","Guo L","Finn AV","Lentz SR","Chauhan AK"]

METHODS::Fibronectin-splice variant containing extra domain A (Fn-EDA) is associated with smooth muscle cells (SMCs) following vascular injury. The role of SMC-derived Fn-EDA in SMC phenotypic switching or its implication in neointimal hyperplasia remains unclear. Herein, using human coronary artery sections with a bare metal stent, we demonstrate the expression of Fn-EDA in the vicinity of SMC-rich neointima and peri-strut areas. In mice, Fn-EDA colocalizes with SMCs in the neointima of injured carotid arteries and promotes neointima formation in the comorbid condition of hyperlipidemia by potentiating SMC proliferation and migration. No sex-based differences were observed. Mechanistic studies suggested that Fn-EDA mediates integrin- and TLR4-dependent proliferation and migration through activation of FAK/Src and Akt1/mTOR signaling, respectively. Specific deletion of Fn-EDA in SMCs, but not in endothelial cells, reduced intimal hyperplasia and suppressed the SMC synthetic phenotype concomitant with decreased Akt1/mTOR signaling. Targeting Fn-EDA in human aortic SMCs suppressed the synthetic phenotype and downregulated Akt1/mTOR signaling. These results reveal that SMC-derived Fn-EDA potentiates phenotypic switching in human and mouse aortic SMCs and neointimal hyperplasia in the mouse. We suggest that targeting Fn-EDA could be explored as a potential therapeutic strategy to reduce neointimal hyperplasia.

翻译标题与摘要 下载文献
影响因子:4.65
发表时间:2020-01-01
DOI:10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.313602
作者列表:["Lee SY","Ahn JM","Mintz GS","Hong SJ","Ahn CM","Park DW","Kim JS","Kim BK","Ko YG","Choi D","Jang Y","Park SJ","Hong MK"]

METHODS:OBJECTIVE:The goal of this study was to determine the impact of late-acquired stent malapposition (LASM) on long-term clinical outcomes in patients treated with coronary stent implantation. Approach and Results: We investigated major adverse cardiac event during 10 years after 6-month intravascular ultrasound examination using our previous studies database. A total of 732 patients treated with bare-metal stent (54 LASM versus 678 non-LASM) and 529 patients treated with first-generation drug-eluting stent (82 LASM versus 447 non-LASM), who did not have clinical event or censoring at the time of follow-up intravascular ultrasound, were included for the present analysis. major adverse cardiac event was defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization and stent thrombosis. Multivariable adjustment and inverse probability weight were performed to consider baseline differences. After multivariable adjustment, LASM was related to a greater risk of major adverse cardiac event (hazard ratio, 1.666 [95% CI, 1.041-2.665]; P=0.0333) and very-late stent thrombosis (hazard ratio, 3.529 [95% CI, 1.153-10.798]; P=0.0271) than non-LASM in patients treated with first-generation drug-eluting stent, but not in those treated with bare-metal stent. Results were consistent after inverse probability weight. Among patients with LASM of first-generation drug-eluting stent, no late stent thrombosis occurred in patients who continued to receive dual antiplatelet therapy. CONCLUSIONS:The relationship between LASM and major adverse cardiac event might depend on the type of implanted stents during the long-term follow-up, highlighting the clinical significance of polymers and drugs in drug-eluting stent system.

翻译标题与摘要 下载文献
方向

复制标题
发送后即可在该邮箱或我的下载查看该文献
发送
该文献默认存储到我的下载

科研福利

临床科研之家订阅号

报名咨询

建议反馈
问题标题:
联系方式:
电子邮件:
您的需求: