Comparison of Detection Methods for Tracheoesophageal Fistulae with a Novel Method: Capnography with CO2 Insufflation.

气管食管瘘检测方法与新方法的比较: CO2 吹气法二氧化碳造影。

  • 影响因子:2.36
  • DOI:10.1097/MPG.0000000000002647
  • 作者列表:"Yasuda JL","Staffa SJ","Ngo PD","Clark SJ","Jennings RW","Manfredi MA
  • 发表时间:2020-01-27

BACKGROUND:Tracheoesophageal fistulae (TEF) are difficult to detect and require a high index of suspicion. We hypothesized that capnography to identify a spike in end-tidal carbon dioxide (etCO2) during esophagoscopy with carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation would facilitate TEF diagnosis due to gas passage from the esophagus to the trachea. METHODS:Medical records of 42 consecutive cases of recurrent, acquired, or missed congenital TEF diagnosed between January 2015 and November 2019 that underwent esophagoscopy with CO2 insufflation were reviewed. A control cohort of 97 similarly endoscopically evaluated patients with surgical confirmation of absence of recurrent TEF (e.g. patients undergoing posterior tracheopexy) was also collected. All patients underwent pre-operative esophagoscopy, bronchoscopy, and capnography; diagnostic abilities of various combinations of modalities for TEF identification were calculated. RESULTS:Statistical analysis identified a maximum intra-esophagoscopy end-tidal CO2 level of 68 mmHg as the optimal discriminator between cases and controls, though in practice we anecdotally find that recurrent TEFs typically permit rapid rise ≥ 90 mmHg. Increasing numbers of diagnostic modalities increased diagnostic sensitivity to detect recurrent TEF; the highest diagnostic sensitivity for TEF identification was achieved by the combination of intra-esophagoscopy fluoroscopy plus bronchoscopy plus capnography ≥ 68 mmHg (sensitivity = 88.1%). There were multiple cases of TEF (N = 7 for etCO2 ≥ 68 mmHg, N = 3 for etCO2 ≥ 90 mmHg) identified by capnography that were missed by esophagoscopy. There were 5 (for etCO2 ≥ 68 mmHg) or 6 (for etCO2 ≥ 90 mmHg) cases of recurrent TEF that were missed by all non-surgical methods. CONCLUSION:Attention to etCO2 during esophagoscopy with CO2 insufflation represents a simple, novel way to detect TEF. Identification of TEF remains challenging, though combinations of diagnostic modalities improve diagnostic sensitivity.


背景: 气管食管瘘 (TEF) 很难发现,需要很高的怀疑指数。我们假设在用二氧化碳 (CO2) 进行食管镜检查时,二氧化碳描记术以确定呼气末二氧化碳 (etCO2) 的峰值由于气体从食管到气管的通道,吹气将有助于 TEF 诊断。 方法: 回顾了 2015年1月至 2019年11月期间连续 42 例诊断为复发性、获得性或漏诊先天性 TEF 的病例,这些病例均接受了 CO2 气腹食管镜检查。还收集了 97 例经内镜评估的手术证实无复发性 TEF 的患者 (如进行后气管固定的患者) 的对照队列。所有患者均接受术前食管镜、支气管镜和二氧化碳造影检查; 计算各种 TEF 识别方式组合的诊断能力。 结果: 统计分析确定食管内内镜检查最大呼气末 CO2 水平为 68 mmHg 是病例和对照组之间的最佳判别器, 虽然在实践中,我们偶然发现复发性 TEFs 通常允许快速升高 ≥ 90 mmHg。增加诊断方式的数量增加了检测复发性 TEF 的诊断敏感性; 食管内镜透视 + 支气管镜 + capnography ≥ 68 mmHg (灵敏度 = 88.1%) 联合诊断 TEF 的敏感性最高。食管镜检查有多例 TEF (etCO2 ≥ 68 mmHg n = 7,etCO2 ≥ 90 mmHg n = 3) 漏诊。有 5 例 (etCO2 ≥ 68 mmHg) 或 6 例 (etCO2 ≥ 90 mmHg) 复发性 TEF 被所有非手术方法漏诊。 结论: 在 CO2 吹入食管镜检查中注意 etCO2 是检测 TEF 的一种简单、新颖的方法。TEF 的鉴定仍然具有挑战性,尽管诊断方式的组合提高了诊断敏感性。



来源期刊:Surgical Endoscopy
作者列表:["Yang, Shun-Mao","Chen, Yi-Chang","Ko, Wei-Chun","Huang, Hsin-Chieh","Yu, Kai-Lun","Ko, Huan-Jang","Huang, Pei-Ming","Chang, Yeun-Chung"]

METHODS:Background Dye localization is a useful method for the resection of unidentifiable small pulmonary lesions. This study compares the transbronchial route with augmented fluoroscopic bronchoscopy (AFB) and conventional transthoracic CT-guided methods for preoperative dye localization in thoracoscopic surgery. Methods Between April 2015 and March 2019, a total of 231 patients with small pulmonary lesions who received preoperative dye localization via AFB or percutaneous CT-guided technique were enrolled in the study. A propensity-matched analysis, incorporating preoperative variables, was used to compare localization and surgical outcomes between the two groups. Results After matching, a total of 90 patients in the AFB group ( N  = 30) and CT-guided group ( N  = 60) were selected for analysis. No significant difference was noted in the demographic data between both the groups. Dye localization was successfully performed in 29 patients (96.7%) and 57 patients (95%) with AFB and CT-guided method, respectively. The localization duration (24.1 ± 8.3 vs. 21.4 ± 12.5 min, p  = 0.297) and equivalent dose of radiation exposure (3.1 ± 1.5 vs. 2.5 ± 2.0 mSv, p  = 0.130) were comparable in both the groups. No major procedure-related complications occurred in either group; however, a higher rate of pneumothorax (0 vs. 16.7%, p  = 0.029) and focal intrapulmonary hemorrhage (3.3 vs. 26.7%, p  = 0.008) was noted in the CT-guided group. Conclusion AFB dye marking is an effective alternative for the preoperative localization of small pulmonary lesions, with a lower risk of procedure-related complications than the conventional CT-guided method.

关键词: 暂无
翻译标题与摘要 下载文献
作者列表:["Matava, Clyde","Pankiv, Evelina","Raisbeck, Sam","Caldeira, Monica","Alam, Fahad"]

METHODS:Background The use of artificial intelligence, including machine learning, is increasing in medicine. Use of machine learning is rising in the prediction of patient outcomes. Machine learning may also be able to enhance and augment anesthesia clinical procedures such as airway management. In this study, we sought to develop a machine learning algorithm that could classify vocal cords and tracheal airway anatomy real-time during video laryngoscopy or bronchoscopy as well as compare the performance of three novel convolutional networks for detecting vocal cords and tracheal rings. Methods Following institutional approval, a clinical dataset of 775 video laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy videos was used. The dataset was divided into two categories for use for training and testing. We used three convolutional neural networks (CNNs): ResNet, Inception and MobileNet. Backpropagation and a mean squared error loss function were used to assess accuracy as well as minimize bias and variance. Following training, we assessed transferability using the generalization error of the CNN, sensitivity and specificity, average confidence error, outliers, overall confidence percentage, and frames per second for live video feeds. After the training was complete, 22 models using 0 to 25,000 steps were generated and compared. Results The overall confidence of classification for the vocal cords and tracheal rings for ResNet, Inception and MobileNet CNNs were as follows: 0.84, 0.78, and 0.64 for vocal cords, respectively, and 0.69, 0.72, 0.54 for tracheal rings, respectively. Transfer learning following additional training resulted in improved accuracy of ResNet and Inception for identifying the vocal cords (with a confidence of 0.96 and 0.93 respectively). The two best performing CNNs, ResNet and Inception, achieved a specificity of 0.985 and 0.971, respectively, and a sensitivity of 0.865 and 0.892, respectively. Inception was able to process the live video feeds at 10 FPS while ResNet processed at 5 FPS. Both were able to pass a feasibility test of identifying vocal cords and tracheal rings in a video feed. Conclusions We report the development and evaluation of a CNN that can identify and classify airway anatomy in real time. This neural network demonstrates high performance. The availability of artificial intelligence may improve airway management and bronchoscopy by helping to identify key anatomy real time. Thus, potentially improving performance and outcomes during these procedures. Further, this technology may theoretically be extended to the settings of airway pathology or airway management in the hands of experienced providers. The researchers in this study are exploring the performance of this neural network in clinical trials.

关键词: 暂无
翻译标题与摘要 下载文献
作者列表:["Dhooria S","Chaudhary S","Ram B","Sehgal IS","Muthu V","Prasad KT","Aggarwal AN","Agarwal R"]

METHODS:BACKGROUND:The optimal mode of delivering topical anesthesia during flexible bronchoscopy remains unknown. This article compares the efficacy and safety of nebulized lignocaine, lignocaine oropharyngeal spray, or their combination. METHODS:Consecutive subjects were randomized 1:1:1 to receive nebulized lignocaine (2.5 mL of 4% solution, group A), oropharyngeal spray (10 actuations of 10% lignocaine, group B), or nebulization (2.5 mL, 4% lignocaine) and two actuations of 10% lignocaine spray (group C). The primary outcome was the subject-rated severity of cough according to a visual analog scale. The secondary outcomes included bronchoscopist-rated severity of cough and overall procedural satisfaction on a visual analog scale, total lignocaine dose, subject's willingness to undergo a repeat procedure, adverse reactions to lignocaine, and others. RESULTS:A total of 1,050 subjects (median age, 51 years; 64.8% men) were included. The median (interquartile range) score for subject-rated cough severity was significantly lower in group B compared to group C or group A (4 [1-10] vs 11 [4-24] vs 13 [5-30], respectively; P < .001). The bronchoscopist-rated severity of cough was also the least (P < .001), and the overall satisfaction was highest in group B (P < .001). The cumulative lignocaine dose administered was the least in group B (P < .001). A significantly higher proportion of subjects (P < .001) were willing to undergo a repeat bronchoscopy in group B (73.7%) than in groups A (49.1%) and C (59.4%). No lignocaine-related adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS:Ten actuations of 10% lignocaine oropharyngeal spray were superior to nebulized lignocaine or their combination for topical anesthesia during diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy. TRIAL REGISTRY:ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT03109392; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

翻译标题与摘要 下载文献