扫码登录小狗阅读
Efficacy of Cytotoxic Agents After Progression on Anti-PD-(L)1 Antibody for Pre-treated Metastatic Gastric Cancer.
细胞毒性药物对治疗前转移性胃癌的抗 PD-(L)1 抗体进展后的疗效。
- 影响因子:1.90
- DOI:10.21873/anticanres.14187
- 作者列表:"Kato K","Narita Y","Mitani S","Honda K","Masuishi T","Taniguchi H","Kadowaki S","Ura T","Ando M","Tajika M","Muro K
- 发表时间:2020-04-01
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM:The efficacy of treatment using the anti-programmed cell death-1 (anti-PD-1) antibody for metastatic gastric cancer (mGC) has been established previously. Exploratory analyses in various types of tumours suggest that prior exposure to immune checkpoint inhibitors can enhance the efficacy of subsequent cytotoxic chemotherapy (CTx). Our aim is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CTx for mGC after progression on anti-PD-(ligand) 1 [anti-PD-(L)1] antibody. PATIENTS AND METHODS:We retrospectively evaluated patients with mGC who underwent CTx. The patients received CTx after progression on anti-PD-(L)1 antibody (cohort A) or as a third-line treatment without prior exposure to anti-PD-(L)1 antibody (cohort B). We evaluated: i) clinical characteristics, ii) efficacies, iii) prognoses, and iv) adverse events (AEs). RESULTS:In cohorts A and B, 16 and 68 patients fulfilled the criteria, respectively. In the univariate analysis, the overall response rate was significantly higher in cohort A compared to cohort B (31% vs. 10%, respectively; Odds Ratio:3.96, 95% Confidence Interval:1.06-14.8, p=0.040). The multivariate analysis showed a similar trend. Immune-related AEs did not worsen and were manageable, while new immune-related AEs were not observed. CONCLUSION:CTx after progression on anti-PD-(L)1 antibody demonstrated a favourable efficacy in intensively treated patients with mGC.
摘要
背景/目的: 抗程序性细胞死亡-1 (anti-PD-1) 抗体治疗转移性胃癌 (mGC) 的疗效已被证实。各种类型肿瘤的探索性分析表明,事先暴露于免疫检查点抑制剂可以增强后续细胞毒性化疗 (CTx) 的疗效。我们的目的是评价 CTx 对抗 PD-(配体) 1 [抗 PD-(L)1] 抗体进展后 mGC 的疗效和安全性。 患者和方法: 我们回顾性评估了接受 CTx 的 mGC 患者。患者在抗 PD-(L)1 抗体进展后接受 CTx 治疗 (队列 A) 或作为三线治疗,既往未暴露于抗 PD-(L)1 抗体 (队列 B)。我们评价了: i) 临床特征,ii) 疗效,iii) 预后,iv) 不良事件 (AEs)。 结果: 在队列 A 和 B 中,分别有 16 例和 68 例患者符合标准。在单变量分析中,队列 A 的总体缓解率显著高于队列 B (31% vs.分别为 10%; 比值比: 3.96,95% 可信区间: 1.06-14.8,p = 0.040)。多变量分析显示了类似的趋势。免疫相关的 AEs 没有恶化,并且是可控的,而没有观察到新的免疫相关的 AEs。 结论: 抗 PD-(L)1 抗体进展后的 CTx 对 mGC 强化治疗患者显示出良好的疗效。
小狗阅读
帮助医生、学生、科研工作者解决SCI文献找不到、看不懂、阅读效率低的问题。提供领域精准的SCI文献,通过多角度解析提高文献阅读效率,从而使用户获得有价值研究思路。
METHODS::Diffuse gastric cancer (DGC) is a lethal malignancy lacking effective systemic therapy. Among the most provocative recent results in DGC has been that the alter of the cellular cytoskeleton and intercellular adhesion. CD2-associated protein (CD2AP) is one of the critical proteins regulating cytoskeleton assembly and intercellular adhesion. However, no study has investigated the expression and biological significance of CD2AP in gastric cancer (GC) to date. Therefore, the aim of our study was to explore if the expression of CD2AP is associated with any clinical features of GC and to elucidate the underlying mechanism. Immunohistochemistry of 620 patient tissue samples indicated that the expression of CD2AP is downregulated in DGC. Moreover, a low CD2AP level was indicative of poor patient prognosis. In vitro, forced expression of CD2AP caused a significant decrease in the migration and invasion of GC cells, whereas depletion of CD2AP had the opposite effect. Immunofluorescence analysis indicated that CD2AP promoted cellular adhesion and influenced cell cytoskeleton assembly via interaction with the F-actin capping protein CAPZA1. Overall, the upregulation of CD2AP could attenuate GC metastasis, suggesting CD2AP as a novel biomarker for the prognosis and treatment of patients with GC.
METHODS::Aim: To identify the methylated-differentially expressed genes (MDEGs) that may serve as diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets in Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC) and to explore the methylation-based pathways for elucidating biological mechanisms of EBVaGC. Materials & methods: Gene expression and methylation profiles were downloaded from GEO database. MDEGs were identified by GEO2R. Pathway enrichment analyses were conducted based on DAVID database. Hub genes were identified by Cytoscape, which were further verified by The Cancer Genome Atlas database. Results: A total of 367 hypermethylated, lowly expressed genes were enriched in specific patterns of cell differentiation. 31 hypomethylated, highly expressed genes demonstrated enrichment in regulation of immune system process. After validation using The Cancer Genome Atlas database, seven genes were confirmed to be significantly different hub genes in EBVaGC. Conclusion: EBVaGC-specific MDEGs and pathways can be served as potential biomarkers for precise diagnosis and treatment of EBVaGC and provide novel insights into the mechanisms involved.
METHODS:Gastric adenocarcinoma, like other cancers, is a multifactorial genetic disease, andmetastasis of cancer cells is one of the main features of this illness. The expressionlevels of the CFL1 gene have been modulated in this pathway. Using small interferingRNA (siRNA) in the treatment of gastric cancer is considered a hopeful genetherapeutic approach. The present study reported the level of CFL1 genes betweentumor and margin and healthy tissue of gastric cancer. Also, the features of a cationicnanoparticle with a polymer coating containing polyacrylic acid and polyethylenei-mine that were used in the delivery of CFL1 siRNA, were shown. Then thecytotoxicity, cellular uptake, and gene silencing efficiency of this nanoparticle wereevaluated with CFL1siRNA. Method:In this study, the CFL1 gene expression was measured in 40 gastricadenocarcinoma, marginal and 15 healthy biopsy samples by a real‐time polymerasechain reaction. Physicochemical characteristics, apoptosis, and inhibition of migrationof the delivery of CFL1 siRNA by nanoparticle and lipofectamine were investigated ingastric cancer cells. Result:The CFL1 expression was remarkably increased in gastric cancer tissues incomparison with the marginal samples and normal tissues (p< .05) and the biomarkerindex for CFL1 was obtained as 0.94, then this gene can be probably used as abiomarker for gastric cancer. After treatment of the AGS cell line by CFL1 siRNA, theCFL1 expression level of mRNA and migration in AGS cells were remarkablysuppressed after transfection. Furthermore, the amount of apoptosis increased(p< .05). Conclusion:Our results demonstrated that CFL1 downregulation in AGS cells caninterdict cell migration. Finally, our outcomes propose that CFL1 can function as anoncogenic gene in gastric cancer and would be considered as a potential purpose ofgene therapy for gastric cancer treatment